I get the sense that this particular situation is escalating beyond what is known.
I think we should focus on what is known rather than what we assume.
Assumptions are fine. It’s OK to work from them, but its not OK to assume an assumption is 100% correct – it’s a possibility for something rather than a factual thing. The goal of the requested polygraph is to validate or remove the assumptions.
What is known:
WW was texting and communicating with a male coworker.
She recognized that this communication was bad for her marriage (The next day she texted him and said she could longer talk to him that she was going to work on her marriage to which he didn’t reply.)
That since she is now limiting time with him to work where others are present, we can ASSUME the communications were beyond work and even work events. What we don’t know if that is meeting outside of work, or using opportunities at work to meet (breaks, lunch etc).
We know pictures were exchanged, but so far only have evidence of "innocent" pictures.
We have an insistence from her of nothing inappropriate having taken place (albeit – also an acknowledgement that what they were doing was bad for her marriage). Mitigating this claim is that logs have been deleted.
The dressing up, wearing thongs... I do not equate these things to infidelity, nor even an indicator for infidelity. I got some new patterned shirts this month to wear mainly at work – doesn’t equate to me cheating.
We know the promised timeline will not be complete to the detail needed – as is evident in her statement that parts will be vague.
All the above is VERY disturbing and IMHO clearly indicate some boundaries were crossed. But this sounds like a near-stereotypical workplace emotional affair, and hopefully it was caught BEFORE it crossed to a full physical affair.
Not that it makes the pain less or even the damage less. It’s possible they made out, or held hands, or he pecked her on the cheek or whatever. Or maybe they went at it full-force in group-orgies with the workplace-swingers-club in a BDSM leather dungeon... We don’t know... Truth probably lies somewhere closer to the gentler scenario I imagined.
To clarify that, we have the proposed polygraph.
-
What I fear is happening is a serious lack of communication.
Like... worried got Not Just Friends and read it but isn’t clear if his wife read it too. The book by itself doesn’t do any good. It’s like having a gym-membership card in your pocket and wondering why you don’t lose weight. To gain from the book you read together, talk about it and compare it to your situation.
The fear of making demands clear. Like in waiting with requirements until after Christmas.
The whole kazmoo about the paint.
Heck... the threat about moving out, discussions about renting an apartment and then a couple of days doing DIY’s at home... Heck... if your threats are "true" then go get a neutral white, because the house is going on sale as part of a divorce...
The wife’s comments about drinking... we don’t know from what is shared if she made her concerns clear BEFORE d-day or if this is just an excuse (as it probably is now).
I see ultimatums and threats not carried out. Frankly, to me these threats like "I’m moving out" and then not doing so are comparable to kids who threaten to hold their breath if forced to finish the broccoli on their plate.
Comments about who is right and wrong, and less about results (like the drinking... it’s not really relevant to the infidelity, but it might be relevant to reconciliation. Being sober is not you "winning" that argument – either you need to be sober (as an alcoholic) or you need to moderate your drinking (as we all tend to do) OR it’s a non-issue being used as a retrospective excuse...
--
EA’s are a strange thing...
The book we harp on about – Not Just Friends – was initially published 1985 or so. That’s not really long ago... At the time it was heavily disputed because most therapists didn’t really think emotional affairs were a "thing". Dr. Shirley Glass is probably most noted for being a key factor in changing that perception. Even today, many therapists minimize or even dismiss EA’s.
After all – if your wife and OM "simply" took their lunch together at a quiet bench at a park near work, talked about their families, ambitions, problems, hopes... Maybe even held each other when one started crying... but no groping, no kissing, no acting on any sexual tension or excitement (even though it’s presence is acknowledged) then maybe your wife does believe she did "nothing wrong". At least nothing that justifies your reaction.
I don’t see it that way. I think that if the above is the real scenario then the odds are 9/10 it would have developed into a full-on sexual affair. I do think she did something wrong, and the poly is the tool to realize what it was. Or confirm it was still at this early stage.
--
What I would suggest is communicating.
First of all Worried – you are totally entitled to decide if you want this marriage or not. You don’t describe a very happy or focused relationship so maybe you want to call time on it. But then – I think what you describe is a very typical marriage that might need some adjustment and focus.
If what you know is enough and you want out – then make that clear. Stop all this about the poly and you two start discussing how to end this marriage in the best way possible for the kids.
With the poly – what is it you want to know?
Let’s address what I guess we men fear the most: Did she have sex with him?
Would learning she did be a total dealbreaker? If so – does she know that?
If it is – and especially if she knows – then she will lie in the hope of faking the poly (after all... it’s "only" 85% reliable) or in the hope of you not acting on a failed poly.
What would you call "sex"? Like if they made out, maybe even some groping, but no skin-on-skin contact... would that be "ok"?
I think your best bet is to make the importance of truth very clear to her. Present the poly as a tool that can benefit you both, IF she is being honest.
Make it clear that learning NOW about sexual context or any other context you need will hurt and might even impact your belief in reconciliation. Make it clear that you need direct answers in the timeline – not vague. If they had sex, you don’t need details (beyond what you realistically need) but you need to know what happened.
The poly – present it as the wonder-tool it is: It’s there to help her prove to you that she trusts YOU with the truth. All she has to do is be truthful in the build-up and the poly will confirm her honesty.
Make it equally clear that if she fails then it tells you two things: First of all that you have reason to doubt everything and anything she has told you. For all you know she meets OM at the gate and spends all day with him. More importantly it tells you she doesn’t trust you, and since there is no trust in the marriage then the only logical thing to do is formalize it’s demise.
Make it clear that from now until the poly you two can cohabit and be friendly and all, but you can’t commit to your marriage or to reconciliation fully until you believe her. This period – from now to the poly – is the period she has to sit down and discuss what happened. No need to go into why per se. Until you know WHAT, then the why isn’t really relevant.