1. Even if WW does all the things I need, will I ever really be able to trust her again? Am I just wasting both of our time trying to reconcile?
Q: Those who have reconciled, how did you decide that you could trust your partner again? What questions did you ask yourself that helped give you clarity?
The decision to trust, is yours, as it was mine and as it is every person's. You are the only one who can decide whom you will trust.
My W rebuilt trust with, I think, thousands of trust-building actions that included:
1) answering all my questions consistently, even though I asked them multiple times from multiple POVs
2) getting less defensive as time went on
3) hearing me
4) asking for what she wanted and responding honestly to my requests
5) sitting in MC sessions and taking confrontation after confrontation from our MC and changing in response to them
6) there was more, but I can't think of the words....
2. What did you need to see to convince you that your spouse really did change into a person that would never cheat on you again?
Well, she didn't. I know in theory she can cheat again. I also know that she used IC and MC to close up a lot of her vulnerabilities to cheating. I know she never wanted to cheat. I know that I required a lot more from her than not cheating again - I wanted a better M than we ever had before, and we had a good M before the A. W was willing to do and actually a lot of work to achieve that. So did I.
3. Based on our conversations, the affair for her was a very positive time. She has many fond memories of it. She has said many times that she is sorry she hurt me, and that if she could go back in time she would not do it again. She assures me that she would never cheat on me again because letting go of that relationship was so painful for her, and seeing my pain was so painful for her. However saying those things is not the same as saying "the affair was wrong, and I will never cheat on you again".
Q: Should I be concerned about these positive emotions, and the fact that she seems upset by the fallout of the affair not the affair itself? Or is this generally expected behavior from wayward spouses, and part of the recovery process?
I'd be very concerned. I was OK with my W remembering pleasure from the sex, because I can't imagine doing sex without pleasure, but good memories of the A and reluctance to throw the ap under a bus would have given me 2nd thoughts about R.
As it happened, my W says the first few sexual encounters were pleasurable, but then it became a real chore. On d-day she said that she thought ow was a woman with many positive characteristics, but as of d-day, she had no fond memories of the A. She knew she had violated too many boundaries to count, and she was committed to doing everything she could think of to prevent violating those boundaries in the future.
If I were in your shoes, I think I would hold off on committing to R until and unless my WS realized how her A was a betrayal of herself and of you. As I wrote - perhaps not in so many words - your MC is isn't helping and can't help until your WS is held to account. I would expect a good MC to thank a WS for honesty, and if the WS continues to say they had a great time in the A, I'd expect the MC to recommend D. I just don't see a WS who has fond memories of a period in which they lied to their BS as a good candidate for R. Thinking that breaking up was too painful to contemplate again makes me even less confident your W is a good candidate for R right now. (That means 'nw'; she could become a good R candidate in the future.)
4. I love my wife, and really want to reconcile … I'm having a difficult time getting past the idea that she intentionally had an affair, and that this affair really for all intents and purposes destroyed the part of our marriage that mattered - our vows to each other. Without vows we might as well just be friends with benefits.
Q: Is this a normal place to be 6 months out, and how did you move past these thoughts in order to really reconcile?
Well, I get the desire to R. I certainly had it from the moment my W revealed her A. I wanted it even before my W said she wanted to stay together.
But wanting is different from doing. I didn't actually commit to R until I had seen my W work consistently for R for 90 days - and it would have been better if I had waited longer, just on general principles. She worked 100%, never a slip, for those 90 days. She certainly made mistakes during those 90 days, but I believe every choice she made was in the service of R. I committed to R because I figured we had resolved lots of issues in that period, and I predicted we'd resolve any issue that arose in the future.
But I had gotten past trying to control our future. I knew I could be making a mistake. I consoled myself with, 'If you hit an issue you can't resolve, you can always split.'
Have you committed to R? If so, I think you've done so too early. My reco is to tell your W something like, 'I want to R, but I'm not confident enough that you're as committed as I am. I have the following concerns: ....' If you've already said that explicitly, great. If you haven't your best approach is to do so, IMO.
And another reco is to find a new MC, one who will address the A first.
As for where I was 6 months out, I was still uncertain R would succeed for us. I had just come through a rage stage, which started 5 months out. At the time, SIers spoke of a rage stage coming at 6 months out, so I was either on schedule or a bit early. You don't mention rage, but that may not be a problem. Everyone's timeline is at least a little unique. I'd question myself if I didn't hit rage somewhere between 4 and 12 months out, but I could be wrong.
BTW, when I joined SI, people wrote about d-day 'antiversaries.' I still use the term, but in some ways I'm a Luddite. Of course, in others I'm a visionary - I have some CDS, but I never gave up vinyl.