I hope you don't mistake my disagreement with disrespect either zebra. I certainly don't mean any.
I stand by my opinion that screaming at a coach, getting in their face and bumping them is disrespectful and shows a lack of self control.
I would take issue with any suggestion that the bump was intentional, but I don't disagree with the rest of it. He absolutely looked like an unhinged meathead. But I don't think that even the biggest Travis Kelce hater out there could stand there and say that Kelce doesn't have respect for Andy Reid with a straight face. They have been together for 11 years - Kelce's entire pro career, and have one of the closest coach/player relationships of almost anyone in the league. I agree that another player may not have gotten away with that, but Kelce/Reid have a different relationship than most coach/players - they get each other and it's part of the reason that the franchise has been so successful. It's no secret that Travis Kelce is an overly emotional player - he'd probably be the first to call himself a hot head. The irony is that of all the toxic masculinity in the NFL - and there is no shortage of that historically - I actually find him to be a pretty refreshing change of pace. I think it’s good for there to be a high profile NFL player that talks about vulnerability and making mistakes and - gasp - his feelings. I expect he will address the issue on his podcast whenever they do their next episode.
I'm not surprised Kelce hugged Reid. That's what many people do after losing control of themselves
.
Right. None of us are perfect. We all lose our cool sometimes and let the pressure get to us and snap at our spouse, make a snarky comment to a friend, or yell at our kids, etc (you know, the people close to us). And when we do, the correct thing to do is own it, apologize, and (hopefully) move on. If Andy Reid was mad about this he'd have been perfectly to have benched Kelce for the game and traded him after the season ended. And maybe that would have satisfied you and some others, but arguably that would be have cost the team the Super Bowl victory. Instead, it appears Andy Reid put his ego aside, saw it for what it was, accepted the apology and was able to use one of his best players to go on to win the Super Bowl. His ability to understand and manage his players is part of why he's a great coach. It's between the two of them and I don't think we're owed any more than this.
I think what feels disingenuous is the seeming desire for blood that exists beyond this, and the suggestion that any calls for context are somehow excusing abusive behaviour. Two things can be true: (1) the outburst crossed a line; and (2) that the context it occurred in is highly relevant to how much weight/time/attention we should devote to it.
This behavior would not be acceptable for anyone else so why are we (not you emergent,we in general) giving him a pass? I'm just really surprised at the excuses being made for him.
I mean, yeah. If I got in my boss's face and screamed because I was worked up because a deal I was working on had gone sideways and I wanted my boss to give me more responsibility so I could ensure it went better, I'd appropriately be called a lunatic. But I work in an office environment where any amount of screaming is unacceptable. To that end though, if my boss was happy with the outcome of the deal and tackled me to the ground and starfished on me the way that Andy Reid did to Chris Jones during the post-game celebrations, I would probably think that crossed some lines too. Suggesting that the sidelines of the Super Bowl is qualitatively different than other environments is not, by itself, making excuses for bad behaviour. Obviously the context matters. Like it or loathe it, professional football is a highly physical, aggressive, arguably barbaric activity - essentially NONE of the behaviour that occurs during a football game would be acceptable in many other context. It is one thing to judge/dislike/have valid complaints about the sport, but it's quite another to ignore/refuse to understand the context of the sport just to hate on Travis Kelce.
He is not the first, and wont be the last, athlete to have an emotional outburst in the context of a game. It is common to see bats thrown and watercoolers tipped, Tom Brady screamed and smashed ipads, Serena Williams yelled at the ref (which somehow earned her more backlash than the many male tennis players before her that smashed rackets), and the NHL's fighting culture is prolific (when I was a kid - there were entire shows dedicated to hockey fights). While I don't think any of that behaviour reflects well on any of those athletes individually, it's not fair or appropriate to suggest that their behaviour in the context of the game, means that they are likely to be abusive in other contexts, which is exactly what you are suggesting when you say this:
If my daughter was dating him I would advise her to run in the other direction.
That part seems like an over-reaction.
Edit: Finished an unfinished sentence.
[This message edited by emergent8 at 1:57 AM, Wednesday, February 14th]